salesforce.com
Software that Measures Behavior Improves it. Mere Measurement?
by naisan on Apr.06, 2009, under BI, Business Intelligence, Performance Management, corporate strategy, enterprise software, innovation, salesforce.com, strategy, tech industry
There were a swarm of papers published in the late 90′s and early 2000′s surrounding a very, very strange thing: turns out that asking people to fill out a survey about a positively viewed product actually causes them to buy more of that product, buy it more quickly, and become more profitable customers. This is called, in some circles, the “Mere Measurement effect.”Just in case you want to know where I came up with the above, here’s some light bedtime reading: Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry.
There are a slew more articles on the subject, a quick perusal on Google Scholar will get you acquainted with the literature.
There’s an older observation related to this new research: “What gets measured generally gets done.” Named for the place where studies were done on production improvements in the 1920′s, The Hawthorne Effect has now been evolved into multiple lines of research and nuance, but the point is simple: paying attention to things improves their performance.
Shocking huh?
Although today some research points to the fact that only measuring things does not necessarily improve them, the fact remains that measurement is vital to increased performance, especially as a form of attention given to a vital area. If you consider that timing a race is the only way to determine if one has run faster, and that looking at splits or heart rates or pace are also helpful to athletes in a training situation, it is obvious that measurement is a key to improved performance.
So how does Business Intelligence and the software industry as a whole make use of this?
Simple: turns out that any software that measures something, and shows that measurement, and interim measurements, to the people performing that behavior, will cause improvement against those measures. If that software shows those results publicly, or allows them to be discussed, things get even better.
We all see this is enterprise software sales, especially on inside sales teams, where the bell gets rung for each deal, where whiteboards show bookings quarter-to-date, and indeed in the entire performance monitoring industry.
If software not only measured those results, but also caused salespeople to think through and state their intentions (commits) and focus on the growth toward their intentions (pipeline), especially if we view the changes over time, the above research gives us a clear indication that sales performance would improve.
Oddly enough, if we stick with the sales performance theme, we find that most people use a CRM package to look at actual results (bookings) and usually pipeline. But almost all CRM packages don’t show changes in pipeline over time, or bring the key measures that matter to the fore, and track them over time.
This is echoed through most software packages: measurement is for managers – but that’s actually the place where it does the least good.
I say: Measurement for the masses!
The partners are getting restless / going native
by naisan on Sep.19, 2007, under SaaS, partnership, salesforce.com
A couple of questions here at Dreamforce’s partner session panel discussion have gotten a bunch of laughs from the partners in the audience:
“Last year you said build in Apex, now you’re saying build an independent tool, and now you’re saying get leads for salesforce.com. . .”
“What about AppStore? Where is that going – I haven’t heard anything about it this year.”
and from the panel: “Ask not what salesforce can do for you. . .”
Comments like these are at the heart of partnering, and occupy a bunch of time for me: can you stay with the same message for your partners over a series of years. But I am struck with the misalignment of partners in so many cases: partners want to sell product to salesforce’s users, and salesforce wants new leads. So that’s always going to be difficult.
The trouble is that folks that are willing to go and take on the acquisition costs of winning net new business probably don’t want to give that away with nothing in return, and so in lies the rub.
Business alignment drives everything, so setting up the business with partners at the center makes for a very different world than trying to stick them in the middle of a customer-vendor relationship. Very different.
Bobby Napiltonia also offered free access to the PRM module for all SFDC partners. Good stuff







